SP 1074511001 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 14400 - 530    passend fuer SUZUKI T 500
SKU: 13856833320

SP 1074511001 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 14400 - 530 passend fuer SUZUKI T 500

Sale price$42.86 Regular price$47.62
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

SP 1074511001 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 14400 - 530 passend fuer SUZUKI T 500SP 1074511001 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 14400 530 passend fuer SUZUKI T 500 1973 Stahl Kettenrder von AFAM werden aus C45 Stahl hergestellt und anschlieend gehrtet, um die Haltbarkeit und damit die Laufleistung zu erhhen. Die Fertigungsqualitt und przision seiner Ritzel macht AFAM zur weltweit anerkannten Referenzmarke in Sachen Motorrad Antriebskomponenten. Stahl Kettenrad Hochwertige Qualitt und erstklassiges Finish Verlngert die Laufleistung

SP 1074511001 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 14400 - 530 passend fuer SUZUKI T 500 1973

Stahl-Kettenräder von AFAM werden aus C45- Stahl hergestellt und anschließend gehärtet, um die Haltbarkeit und damit die Laufleistung zu erhöhen. Die Fertigungsqualität und -präzision seiner Ritzel macht AFAM zur weltweit anerkannten Referenzmarke in Sachen Motorrad-Antriebskomponenten.

  • Stahl-Kettenrad
  • Hochwertige Qualität und erstklassiges Finish
  • Verlängert die Laufleistung Ihres Ketten-Kits

- M E R K M A L -

Kettenrad Version: Standard

Kettenteilung: 530

Kettenrad Zahnanzahl: 42

Kettenrad Typ: 14400

Material: Stahl

passend für:

SUZUKI T 500 1971
SUZUKI T 500 1972
SUZUKI T 500 1973
SUZUKI T 500 1974
SUZUKI T 500 1975
SUZUKI GT 380 1973
SUZUKI GT 380 1974
SUZUKI GT 380 1975
SUZUKI GT 380 1976
SUZUKI GT 380 1977
SUZUKI GS 400 1977
SUZUKI GS 400 1978
SUZUKI GS 400 1979
SUZUKI GSX 400 E 1981
SUZUKI GSX 400 E 1982
SUZUKI GSX 400 E 1983
SUZUKI GSX 400 E 1984
SUZUKI GSX 400 E 1985
SUZUKI GSX 400 E 1986
SUZUKI GSX 400 E 1987
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1980
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1981
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1982
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1983
SUZUKI GS 450 L 1980
SUZUKI GS 450 L 1981
SUZUKI GS 450 L 1982
SUZUKI GS 450 L 1983
SUZUKI GS 450 L 1984
SUZUKI GS 450 L 1985
SUZUKI GS 450 L 1986
SUZUKI GS 450 L 1987
SUZUKI GS 450 S 1981
SUZUKI GT 500 1976
SUZUKI GT 500 1977
SUZUKI GS 400 E 1978
SUZUKI GS 550 D 1977
SUZUKI GS 550 D 1978
SUZUKI GSX 400 E 1980
SUZUKI GSX 400 F KATANA 1982
SUZUKI GSX 400 F KATANA 1983
SUZUKI GSX 400 F KATANA 1981
SUZUKI GS 550 D 1979
SUZUKI GS 400 E 1979
SUZUKI GS 450 S 1984
SUZUKI GS 450 S 1982
SUZUKI GS 450 S 1983
SUZUKI GS 450 S 1985
SUZUKI GS 450 S 1987
SUZUKI GS 450 S 1986
SUZUKI GS 450 S 1988
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1987
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1984
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1986
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1985
SUZUKI GS 450 E 1988
SUZUKI GT 380 1972

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 13856833320

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 1902 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
I
Verified Purchase
Isabel
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 4
Perfect for traveling
Strap broke off Easy to use, perfect size to carry around
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 23, 2025
J
Josef K
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 2
Fire Resistant Maybe, Not Fireproof
This small passport holder/bag from Ready Now Bags is quite unusual, it claims to be fireproof! We tested it with a lighter flame and the 'fireproof' claim initially seemed to hold up: a few seconds of direct flame on one spot had no effect on the main outside material of the bag or on the zipper material. It did cause the [nylon?] fabric running across the top of the outside pocket to start melting, and presumably the tag would also melt (as another reviewer found). My wife didn't like the bag anyway, so we decided to try a more rigorous test (initially I was hesitant, because I didn't want to ruin the bag). We put a spot in the middle of the back side of the bag in a direct candle flame for 30 seconds. It did not melt or catch fire and was only a bit degraded in appearance after the soot was scrubbed off. The inside of the bag in the area where the flame had been was hot, but not too hot to touch. We repeated the 30 second candle flame test on a corner of the bag. This time the corner of the bag caught fire after about 20 seconds (specifically, the piping material around the edge), and the fabric part of the zipper melted all the way through. I haven't tried lighting other hand bags on fire, so I'm not sure how an average one would compare, but I think 'fireproof' is too much of a claim, it may be fair to say this bag is 'fire resistant'. The material is neat and I would say attractive. Note that the bag is pretty thin [8.9in x 4.8 in x 0.7in], which is perfect for some purposes but you can't cram a lot of stuff into it. I don't know whether the RFID block works, but it doesn't seem to impede a cellphone signal at all when a cellphone is placed inside the bag (tested before fire tests). The construction quality of the bag is just okay, it's a little bit uneven/wrinkled around the edges; this material is probably difficult to work with. No functional problems, though. The pockets and slots for organizing on the inside of the bag are nice. The loop on the back that the hand strap is attached to is pretty thick and seems robust, you could attach a longer strap for shoulder or neck carry if desired. If the bag was only advertised as 'fire resistant' I would give it a higher score, but it is advertised as 'fireproof' which is quite an overclaim.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 1, 2024
C
Verified Purchase
Canik
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Quality and security-oriented wallet
Color: Adventure Brown - Forest Brown
This is a neatly constructed wallet. The material of the leather feels satisfying to carry unlike previous wallets. This wallet consists of many card slots, and allows ease of access between them. The wallet can fit checks, cash and is just a nice layout and style to be able to look through it. Because some of our cards support RFID and NFC technology, bad actors can try to steal our credentials. This wallet has a material to mitigate these occurrences, but like anything in security whether it be physical security controls or the wide scope of cybersecurity, do not rely on it and try to be up-to-date with the trend. I am sure we would all want to be one step above in relation to keeping our credentials secure. Still, it is an excellently built wallet and I highly recommend it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
George Murati
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Easy to use
Color: Adventure Brown - Forest Brown
Cards load easier and easy to remove them to use. Holds money and cards for easy use. Nice and supple and wears excellently. Good quality leather and card slot are bigger then other wallets I have tried.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
riceliteratureandbooks
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Beautiful Wallet
Color: With NO Logo - Smooth Nappa Black
Well constructed and beautiful wallet. The black Nappa leather I ordered is soft and smooth to the touch and you can tell by the look, feel, and smell that it is high quality. I love that you can order this with both a logo and no logo for a clean look. The design on this is well thought out. I'd definitely recommend this wallet to anyone. It is an amazing value and far superior to any other $30 wallet I've ever seen.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2026

recommand products