Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
WAVLINK WL-UG39DK3 USB 3.0 Hub Fast Charging Gigabit Ethernet Dual Display Video Dock with DVI / HDIt is the ideal solution that supports various laptop standards for various working environments or shared workspaces. Additionally, it is a perfect partner for ultrabooks, providing additional USB ports to connect all necessary peripherals, offering better ergonomics and convenience. It also allows IT administrators to standardize a dock throughout the organization, making it easy for users to understand and use Through a simple USB cable, you can
- It is the ideal solution that supports various laptop standards for various working environments or shared workspaces. Additionally, it is a perfect partner for ultrabooks, providing additional USB ports to connect all necessary peripherals, offering better ergonomics and convenience. It also allows IT administrators to standardize a dock throughout the organization, making it easy for users to understand and use
- Through a simple USB cable, you can access up to two full HD displays (HD and DVI-I) for mirroring/extending the desktop to external monitors, as well as Gigabit Ethernet, microphone, speakers, external hard drives, optical drives, printers, USB keyboards, mice, and many other USB devices
- The Cubic design not only consolidates your devices but is also an art form from an aesthetic perspective, providing you with a new user experience
- With just a simple cable connection to your computer, you can access large-screen displays, stereo speakers, printers, USB keyboards, mice, and other USB devices. The multifunctional USB 3.0 docking station has three external display outputs (HD, DVI, and VGA), which can be used in combinations of HD, DVI, and VGA to extend or mirror your desktop. Each video output supports high-definition video resolution (2048 × 1152) and HD video playback, providing a good solution for expanding the video capabilities of laptops. It is designed for users who need to connect and manage multiple devices at home or in the office, aiming to enhance the connectivity of laptops
Applications:
- Ideal for hotel shared workspaces or short-term hot desk applications.
- Turns laptops into multi-display workstations (up to 3 screens) to improve productivity.
- Adds dual video outputs to laptops or small computers where the video card cannot be replaced.
- Connects a variety of peripherals at home/office to laptops through a single USB connection.
- Compatible Systems:
- Windows 10, 8.1, 7 – Drivers can be automatically installed via Windows Update (with internet connection)
- Requires support for Intel/AMD/NVIDIA main GPU and WDDM-compatible drivers (most recent systems meet this requirement).
- Ethernet port requires full-duplex network infrastructure
- Updating USB 3.0 host controller drivers and graphics drivers is recommended for optimal performance and compatibility
Specifications:
- Voltage: 100~240V
- Operating Temperature: 0℃~40℃
- Storage Temperature: -10~70℃
- Power: 12V/4A
- Interfaces: HD, DVI, USB 3.0/2.0, Gigabit port, charging port DC
- Chipset: DL-3900, VL813, EJ179V
- Processor: 2.0GHz Core2Duo or higher
- Memory: 1GB
- Recommended Requirements for Full Screen Video Playback:
- Processor: Core i3, i5, or i7 2+ GHz
- Memory: 4GB
Note:
- Cannot be used in conjunction with non-DisplayLink USB graphics adapters and drivers.
- Not compatible with macOS, ARM versions of Windows (Surface RT), and Linux/Unix.
- 2.4GHz wireless devices (such as wireless keyboard and mouse adapters) may not work well near USB 3.0 devices or hubs. It is recommended to connect to a USB 2.0 port.
Package included
- 1 x USB 3.0 Docking Station
- 1 x DC 12V/4A Power Adapter
- 1 x USB A to B 3.0 Extension Cable
- 1 x DVI to VGA Adapter
- 1 x CD
- 1 x English User Manual
Specifications
| Adapter Plug | EU Plug |
| Brand | Wavlink |
| User Manual (Language) | English |
| Gross Weight | 1.130kg |
| Volume Weight | 0.602kg |
| Package Length | 16.800cm |
| Package Width | 12.800cm |
| Package Height | 12.500cm |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 1743 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame.
What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools
He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible.
Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur.
Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life.
The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian.
Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith.
You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error.
BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015